PUBLICATIONS

Papers

[13] Laakso, M. and Polonioli, A. Accepted. Open access in ethics research: an analysis of open access availability and author self-archiving behaviour in light of journal copyright restrictions Scientometrics. 

[12] Polonioli, A. Forthcoming. A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy. Synthese. 

[11] Polonioli, A. 2018. A Blind Spot in Research on Foreign Language Effects in Judgment and Decision-Making. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 227.

[10] Polonioli, A. 2017. New issues for new methods: Ethical and editorial challenges for an experimental philosophy. Science and Engineering Ethics., 23(4), 1009-1034.

[9] Polonioli, A. 2016. Adaptive Rationality, Biases, and the Heterogeneity Hypothesis. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7, 787-803.

[8] Polonioli, A. 2016. Reconsidering the normative argument from bounded rationality. Theory and Psychology, 26 (3), 287-303.

[7] Polonioli, A. 2016. Metrics, flawed indicators, and the case of philosophy journals. Scientometrics, 108 (2), 987–994.

[6] Polonioli, A. 2016. Debunking unwarranted defences of the status quo in the humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 107 (3), 1519–1522.

[5] Polonioli, A. 2015. Stanovich’s Arguments against the Adaptive Rationality Project: An Assessment”. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 49:55-62

 [4] Polonioli, A. 2015. The uses and abuses of the coherence-correspondence distinction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 507.

[3] Polonioli, A. 2014. Evolution, Rationality, and Coherence Criteria. Biological Theory, 9:309–317.

[2] Polonioli, A. 2014. Blame it on the Norm! The Challenge from “Adaptive Rationality”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44 (2): 131-150.

[1] Polonioli, A. 2012. Gigerenzer’s External Validity Argument against the Heuristics and Biases Project: An Assessment. Mind & Society, 11 (2), 133-148.

Book reviews

[2] Polonioli, A. 2014. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. Philosophical Psychology, 27 (5):760-764.

[1] Polonioli, A. 2013. Re-assessing the Heuristics Debate. Mind & Society, 12 (2): 263-271.